Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:31:42 -0500
Reply-To: "George D. McCallion" <medchem**At_Symbol_Here**COMCAST.NET>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: "George D. McCallion" <medchem**At_Symbol_Here**COMCAST.NET>
Subject: Re: Yearly Fume Hood Monitoring-Automated system
Comments: To: Kathleen Schmidt-Nebril
In-Reply-To: <BBFA6832756A874D89D201416246904005A8F0FB**At_Symbol_Here**exchng2k.dom.edu>
From a safety standpoint, I would highly recommend a secondary inspection. It will not only confirm that your safety controls are functioning properly, but also make the Students & Faculty more confident in their working environments. This should apply in all facilities which utilize ventilated enclosures, and not specific to-in this case-Dominican University. Respectfully, George D. McCallion Chemist III Johnson Matthey Pharmaceutical Materials Chemical Process Research & Development 2003 Nolte Drive West Deptford, NJ 08066-1742 Voice: 856.384.7255 Fax: 856.384.7186 E-Mail: mccalgd**At_Symbol_Here**jmusa.com ************************************************************************ ********* On Feb 24, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Schmidt-Nebril, Kathleen wrote: > We have a new science building facility here at the university > which via remote computer sensing can confirm hood flow on the main > system. Would this satisfy the yearly requirement for hood system > checks or do we need to have an independent company come in to > perform this ? > > > Kathleen Schmidt Nebril > CHO > Dominican University > River Forest, Il 60305
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post